07 Apr 2022

AIFMD II: change in Directive, change in direction?

On 25 November 2021 the European Commission published proposals on the AIFMD, identifying a number of potential enhancements for a revised ‘AIFMD II’

By Peter Flynn

Associate, Funds Regulation & Governance

3 minute read time 

On 25 November 2021 the European Commission published proposals on the Alternative Investment Fund Management Directive (AIFMD), following a consultation process which closed in January 2021. The proposals identify a number of areas of potential enhancement and growth for the directive, essentially creating a revised ‘AIFMD II’.

While the Commission found that AIFMD is generally fit for purpose and achieving its objectives, there were a number of areas of potential challenge identified. These included overseeing financial stability risks, inefficiencies in monitoring investment funds, and the need for more alignment across jurisdictions in terms of applying consistent definitions of delegation rules.


Evolving the Directive

The proposals raised by the Commission to address these challenges are more of an evolution of the existing directive than a radical departure. Changes proposed include amendments to the National Private Placement Regime framework, particularly with regard to FATF, amendments to delegation arrangements by EU AIFMs, and new rules related to liquidity management, whereby authorised AIFMs managing open-ended AIFs will need to select at least one liquidity management tool from a new Annex V AIFMD to be used in exceptional circumstances. ESMA will also have the power to require AIFMs to activate or deactivate these liquidity management tools, as needed.

National competent authorities will also have the power to permit AIFMs and AIFs to use depositary services located in other member states while the commission reviews whether it would be appropriate to prepare further measures with regard to further integrating the market. The Commission also proposes that a central securities depository be permitted to be appointed a delegate of a depositary.


Depositary matters

The depositary passport, which had been consulted upon, has been deemed, for now, to be infeasible on the basis that there is currently an absence of harmonised EU securities and insolvency law, which would make the introduction of the passport challenging.


Non-EU implications

While these are not ground-breaking changes, they will have implications for EU AIFs and AIFMs, as well as non-EU (including UK) AIFs and AIFMs. Non-EU AIFMs will experience tightening of delegation rules, as well as a requirement for increased disclosures under NPPR.

Non-EU AIFMs may wish proactively to adopt the proposals on a voluntary basis, if investors desire this, or for strategic and competitive reasons.

There is also an open question around the extent to which the UK will adopt the Commission’s proposals in terms of the onshored AIFMD. While adoption would help ensure alignment and consistency between the two iterations of AIFMD, there is also the possibility of the FCA adopting part of the new proposals, creating its own amendments to AIFMD, or indeed retaining the directive as is, resulting in regulatory divergence. In this sense the Commission’s proposals also represent something of a case study for the post-Brexit UK-EU regulatory framework, and the FCA’s next moves will be closely examined – it is unclear at present when or whether a UK AIFMD II will be consulted upon.


Looking forward

Regardless of the immediate next steps from an FCA perspective, the timeframe for implementation of the new Directive will be relatively lengthy: the Commission, the European Parliament and the European Council will examine the proposals and make any amendments, and this will be followed by a two-year implementation period.

We are therefore unlikely to see the formal implementation of AIFMD II until at least 2024 or 2025, but it will bring changes to the AIF market, both for EU and third country firms, with the added question of how the UK regulatory regime will react. Watch this space!


Latest insights

Science-based targets: commitment and urgency needed

RBS International reports on the need for alternative investment funds (AIFs) to remain committed to science-based climate targets and instil more urgency in overcoming barriers to adoption.

25 May 2023

How Fund Managers can prepare for the TNFD

Biodiversity conservation is coming to the fore – and with that, the need for more robust standards around disclosure and risk management. Fund managers should seize the opportunity to shape them by engaging early, testing and learning.

25 May 2023

How can funds find their way out of the liquidity conundrum?

We discuss what can funds do to bolster their resilience in a market environment of thinning liquidity and costlier capital?

25 May 2023